As you already know, pharma accounts are one of the main tools used by arbitrageurs. They play a key role in the process of traffic acquisition, where the main figures are the main account (also called “mother”) and autoresponders. The success of the whole scheme directly depends on the quality of the “mother”.
A reliable pharma account is able to cope with many abuses and guarantee a stable flow. But if the pharma is weak, this can lead to the failure of the entire scheme and the blocking of all related autoresponders.
There are two types of pharma on the market now: server and manual. Let’s understand their differences and determine which option is more suitable for your tasks.
When it comes to server farming, programs or server solutions are used to help create and manage accounts automatically. Usually, bots are used for this purpose, for example, those running on ZennoPoster or other similar automated platforms. These bots take on the task of creating accounts and performing various operations that are required for a pharma.
Server-based pharma stands out because it can be easily scaled, manage a large number of accounts at the same time, and automate routines. But at the same time, you shouldn’t forget about the risks: FB can track such processes and block them, especially if everything is based on mass methods.
However, due to the fact that you can work with a large number of accounts at once, the cost of server-based pharma is much lower compared to the manual approach. In the manual approach, it is impossible to launch new accounts as quickly and in such a volume, which makes the server-based solution more economical.
The main disadvantage of server-based pharma is its monotony. Good regs use about 20 different algorithms to run hundreds, if not thousands, of accounts through them. This not only makes the process predictable but also reduces the quality of the accounts themselves. Another problem is that a small number of methods used can make actions obvious to FB. In most cases, ordinary regers are limited to 5 algorithms, which is clearly not enough for a high-quality result. Moreover, cookies are almost never used outside of FB, which negatively affects the platform’s trust in accounts.
Another significant drawback is the lack of normal communication with account contacts. The process of pharma, by and large, comes down to subscriptions to groups, likes of posts and reposts, which makes such accounts very unattractive and reduces their value.
Manual pharma (or live pharma) is a process where accounts are created and managed manually. This approach is more attentive and allows you to create more reliable and “human” accounts. These accounts are less likely to be blocked and are better suited to the requirements of the social network. However, manual pharming requires more time, effort, and resources to create and maintain accounts at the proper level.
The main advantage of manual pharmacy is the uniqueness of actions. Each farmer chooses how to manage accounts and is not limited to templates. This allows them to perform a variety of tasks: correspond with other users, comment on posts, reply to comments, and watch videos. Sometimes they even play games built into social networks to add activity and increase account trust.
Another advantage is the preparation before registration. Often, before creating an account, pharmacists “walk” it on the Internet to collect cookies and make it more natural in the eyes of the social network. As a result, such an account looks more alive and is less likely to be blocked.
The main disadvantage is the price. The simplest accounts cost from $3, and if you want a high-quality, long-grown account with good activity, the price can start from $8 and up. However, high cost does not always guarantee quality. The human factor plays an important role here – many farmers chase quantity rather than quality. Because of this, the result may not be as reliable as we would like.
At first, it may seem that manual pharmacy is better in all respects except for the cost. But in reality, things are not so simple. Finding a reliable seller with really high-quality handmade pharmaceuticals is quite a challenge. There are not many such sellers on the market, and there is always a queue for them. As for other offers, most of the “manual” accounts are almost the same in quality as those that are farmed on the server (the influence of the human factor, poor quality of pharma), but they are much more expensive. That’s the way it is.