Tone of voice in visuals: how to make sure your creative doesn't burn out in a week

Tone of voice in visuals: how to make sure your creative doesn't burn out in a week
0
219
8min.

In the world of arbitrage and digital marketing, creatives make all the difference. One visual can take a campaign to the skies, while another can drain a budget to nothing. But it’s not just about colors or pictures. More and more often, designers talk about the tone of voice in the visual, the very “vibe” that the audience feels when they see an ad. It can be a serious presentation with graphs or a meme you send to a friend at two in the morning. And it’s this tone that determines whether people will stop at your creative.

We talked to Kateryna, Leadpanda’s designer, about how she captures this tone and turns images into creatives that “take up space in the user’s head.” In this conversation, we’ll share honest insights on how to understand when a visual is burning out, when to change the plot, and when small edits are enough, what quick hacks refresh the creative, and how not to lose brand recognition.

What does “tone of voice” mean to you in visuals? How do you define it when creating creatives for a specific audience?

Tone of voice in visuals is about the vibe. It’s not just about “what we show”, but “how it comes across to people”. The same idea can look like a strict business post with graphs, or like a meme you send to a friend at two in the morning.

To get the tone right, I always look at a few things:

The ToR or brief. Even the title can immediately set the tone: are we serious or are we joking?
Emotion. Do I want people to laugh, save the post, or click “read more”? Emotion dictates the presentation.
Platform. TikTok likes drive and chaos, Instagram likes beautiful pictures and style, Facebook likes content and directness.
Target. The reaction we are waiting for: laughter, trust, likes, or clicks to the site.
Audience. There’s no magic here: you need to clearly understand who you’re doing it for. What works for Gen Z on TikTok may not work at all on LinkedIn.

As a result, the tone of voice in a visual is a mix of manner, mood, and context. If everything comes together, the creative ceases to be a “picture for advertising” and becomes understandable, lively, and “yours” for the people it is addressed to.

What are the first signals that a visual has burned out and stopped working? What to watch: CTR, comments, user behavior?

The first “bell” is that the audience’s reaction is getting weaker. If yesterday a post collected dozens of comments and saves, and today it’s only a few, it means that the creative has stopped catching on. There are fewer likes, reposts, and interactions, and the reach is also falling, because the algorithms see that the content is not interesting.

An indifferent “scroll by” appears – people don’t even stop at the picture, they just fly on. This can be seen in the dynamics of views and how much time they spend on the page after contacting the creative. If the interaction time decreases, users are simply bored.

CTR is the main indicator. If the percentage of clicks drops, it means that the visual no longer makes people want to click. People can see it, but it doesn’t inspire action.

Another important parameter is the frequency of impressions. If the same audience sees a creative more than 7-10 times, it automatically starts to “burn out.” People get tired of repetition and stop responding, even if the visual once worked well.

An equally important point is the relevance of the message and visuals.If a message or picture looks outdated, does not match the mood of the audience or trends, it ceases to evoke emotion. What was a hit a month ago may be perceived as “yesterday’s news.”

As a result, burnt-out creative can always be recognized by a combination of several signals: decreased engagement, user indifference, falling CTR, high impression frequency, and loss of relevance.

How do you change a visual if the audience has already seen it 10+ times and doesn’t click? Is it more about colors, plot, or style?

When a creative burns out, cosmetic changes are not enough. Simply repainting the background or changing the font won’t solve the problem. The audience is already accustomed to the image, it has ceased to evoke emotion.

What I do:

I change the context. The same message can be presented from a different angle: change the situation, metaphor, character, or visual environment.
I rewrite the presentation of the text. The story should sound different. I add a different mood, a different focus. Sometimes I even change the tone of voice: something that worked in a serious format can work with humor or vice versa.
I update the style a lot. It can be different graphics, different colors, a new composition. Not just to refresh the colors, but to create a completely different mood.
I am building a new script. If people have seen the same story ten times, they need a new angle, a new feeling. For example, replace a static banner with a dynamic story, or a picture of a product with a story about a user.
I test several options. The same task can be solved in different ways, and testing shows what is catching the audience now.

The point is that you need to refresh not only the “colors”, but also the sense, context, and feeling that the user gets from the creative.

Are there any quick “life hacks” that can be done in creative to refresh its tone of voice without a complete redesign?

Yes, and these are the little details that often save creatives when they don’t have time or resources for a full redesign. It’s important to remember that the audience responds not only to the image, but also to the tone, context, and even the slightest change in presentation. Therefore, there are some simple tricks that can be applied quickly, but the effect of them will be tangible.

Change the call to action or tone of voice in the text. Sometimes you just need to replay the language of the appeal. If the text previously sounded “dry” and too straightforward (“Buy now”, “Learn more”), you can replace it with a more lively and friendly one (“Are you ready to try it?”, “Look what’s inside”). Such a micro-step instantly creates a different mood and makes the creative more human.
Update the background or color scheme. Users get tired of the same visual patterns very quickly. It is enough to replace the background with a more contrasting one, use new shades or apply a light texture, and the visual is already perceived as new. This is not a redesign, but the “freshness” is immediately noticeable.
Add light animation. Even minimal dynamics attracts attention more than a static image. It can be the movement of elements, smooth flickering, the appearance of text, or a simple swipe effect. The human eye is attracted to movement, and even basic animation can increase engagement.
Change the angle or scale. The same object can be shown in a completely different way: a close-up instead of a general one, several objects instead of one, a different angle. As a result, a person sees the same essence, but their visual perception is completely different. This creates a sense of a new story, even if the basic design remains the same.
Rearrange the elements. Sometimes the problem is not in the visual itself, but in the composition. Changing the location of a photo, text, or call-to-action button gives a different balance, and thus a new impression of the creative. Algorithms can also “read” the image in a new way, which affects CTR.”

All these “mini-redesigns” work quickly and do not require global changes. Their point is to refresh the tone and context, because the audience will get bored not so much with the image itself as with the feeling of repetition. If you give a new emphasis, a different mood, or a new emotion, even an old visual can sparkle in a new way.

How to avoid a sharp break from the brand when changing the tone of voice in a visual so as not to lose recognition but add a new “spark”?

It’s important to remember: updating your creative doesn’t mean completely abandoning your own identity. The audience “clings” to the established elements – the logo, colors, fonts, and general style. If you keep them, you can safely experiment with tone of voice and stories without losing the sense of brand integrity.

I use the rule 70/30:

70% are permanent brand elements. This is what the user always recognizes: the logo, fonts, corporate colors, and the overall style of visual presentation. They are the “backbone” of recognition.
30% is the space for the new. Here you can add a different story, updated style, new mood or emotion to the tone of voice. This “spark” refreshes the creative, but does not destroy the integrity of the brand.

If there is a complete redesign or rebranding, I am in favor of a transparent approach:

or make a direct transition and clearly show the new identity,
or even better, tell the story of the changes. Explain the reasons, goals, and show the process from the inside: how the team worked, what became the key insight, why these elements were chosen. This approach not only does not repel the audience, but, on the contrary, creates the effect of involvement, openness, and trust.

In fact, changing the tone of voice is not a leap into the unknown, but a gradual update through familiar brand markers. The user sees that the style is recognizable, but the presentation is fresh. This allows you to balance between stability and novelty.

Share your thoughts!

TOP